Search Results

You searched for:
Label: Abrams 1996

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Abrams 1996. Abrams, L., Anglo-Saxon Glastonbury: Church and Endowment (Woodbridge, 1996). 115 charters cited.

    • S 77. Comments, dubious, on estate history of Aust., pp. 50-1
    • S 137. Comments, on estate history, pp. 50-1
    • S 139. Comments, on documentation for Westbury, p. 243
    • S 146. Comments, on documentation for Westbury, p. 246
    • S 152. Comments, on textual tradition and historical background, pp. 23, 148 n. 34, 336-7, 338 n. 98
    • S 227. Comments, on MS sources; probably a forgery but contains genuine 7th-century elements; on Godney; on Meare, pp. 28, 31, 38, 46-7, 124-5, 131
    • S 236. Comments, on transmission of MS 1; on endorsement; on MS sources; MS 1 possibly 10th-century; on estate, pp. 11, 19 n. 56, 29, 31, 35, 38, 126, 195-8
    • S 237. Comments, on MS sources; charter may not originally have referred to West Monkton, bounds presumably a later addition; on Crycbeorh; on possible connection with S 248, pp. 13-14, 31, 39, 80-3, 99-100, 231
    • S 238. Comments, on MS sources; on estate history, pp. 29, 31, 35, 38, 57, 69-72, 118
    • S 243. Comments, doubtful, note on estate, p. 254 n. 72
    • S 245. Comments, on MSS at Glastonbury, pp. 31, 34, 128 n. 24
    • S 246. Comments, on MS sources, p. 28
    • S 247. Comments, on MS sources; on estate history; bounds may be pre-Conquest, pp. 28, 35, 38, 96-7, 113-14, 184, 200-3
    • S 248. Comments, on history of MS 1; on MS sources; on estate history, pp. 11, 35, 38, 81-2, 96-7, 113-14, 183-4, 200-3, 204-5, 207, 231-2
    • S 250. Comments, on MS sources; on estates, pp. 27 n. 94, 28, 37, 46-7, 56, 62, 69, 76, 113, 131-2, 153-4, 166, 170, 179, 218-20
    • S 251. Comments, on MS sources; on estate history, pp. 29, 31, 35, 38, 190, 205, 218-20
    • S 253. Comments, on MS sources; on estate history, pp. 13, 28, 31, 98, 179, 204-11, 219 n. 24
    • S 257. Comments, on MS sources; list of earlier donors could perhaps be contemporary; not genuine as it stands but may contain authentic elements, pp. 28, 31, 128-30, 173 n. 53, 128-30, 173 n. 53
    • S 263. Comments, on estate history, p. 156
    • S 264. Comments, on possible Glastonbury connections of beneficiary, cf. Gl **** (S 1682), p. 175 n. 68
    • S 270a. Comments, on MS sources, on estate history, donor most likely to have been King Egbert, pp. 28, 32, 38, 61, 76-7
    • S 288. Comments, on MS sources, on estate, pp. 30, 34, 47-9
    • S 292. Comments, on MS sources; on correct reading of Andredesdune (against Andredeseme and Andredesdime in existing editions); on estate history, Grundy's interpretation of bounds is not entirely convincing, pp. 29, 33, 38, 47 n. 25, 45, 109-12, 163-4, 216-17, 222
    • S 303. Comments, on MS sources, on estates; list of estate may be genuinely early, pp. 28, 34, 56-7, 64-5, 66-9, 86-7, 101-3, 115, 160-2, 177-8, 196-7, 207, 214, 218-20, 236, 239-40, 322-4
    • S 305. Comments, doubtful, pp. 254 n. 72, 303
    • S 341. Comments, on MS sources, on estate history, pp. 30, 34, 36, 39, 249-52
    • S 341. Comments, on MS sources, on estate history, pp. 30, 34, 36, 39, 249-52
    • S 345. Comments, on Cyricestun, pp. 100-1 n. 144
    • S 347. Comments, on MS sources; on estates, pp. 29, 36, 39, 64-5, 219
    • S 354. Comments, on Chisledon, pp. 52-3
    • S 356. Comments, on Chelworth, p. 85
    • S 359. Comments, on Chisledon, pp. 52-3
    • S 366. Comments, on Chisledon, pp. 52-3
    • S 370. Comments, on Chisledon, pp. 52-3
    • S 371. Comments, on MS sources; on Wrington, pp. 29, 32, 39, 254-6
    • S 373. Comments, on Crowcombe, on Compton and Banwell, pp. 86-7, 95n. 115
    • S 386. Comments, on estate history, pp. 101-3
    • S 391. Comments, on Ower; on Twynham, charter is suspicious, pp. 187-8, 235
    • S 399. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, identification remains uncertain, pp. 30, 34, 35, 39, 249-52
    • S 401. Comments, on estate history, pp. 50-1
    • S 414. Comments, questionable, p. 213
    • S 426. Comments, on MS sources, on estate, on beneficiary, pp. 30, 35, 39, 149-51, 167
    • S 431. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 29, 34, 35, 39, 166-7
    • S 442. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 29, 32, 155-7
    • S 462. Comments, on MS sources; original beneficiary probably Ælfsige, name has been corrupted, pp. 29, 34, 55
    • S 466. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 30, 35, 39, 88-9
    • S 472. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 30, 32, 39, 132-4
    • S 473. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 30, 33, 39, 149-51
    • S 474. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 29, 32, 64-5
    • S 476. Comments, note on estate, p. 254 n. 72
    • S 481. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 28, 34, 36, 38, 171-2
    • S 498. Comments, on MS sources; on estate; criticises Rose-Troup's reconstruction of estate history, pp. 29, 37, 38, 72-3, 73 n. 142
    • S 499. Comments, on MS sources, pp. 25-6, 28, 125 n. 5, 128-30, 299 n. 152
    • S 504. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 30, 32, 179-80
    • S 509. Comments, on MS sources; on estate; authenticity uncertain, pp. 28, 34, 35, 38, 97, 181-4, 237, 271, 307, 324
    • S 513. Comments, on MS sources, reference in Liber Terrarum may be to a different document; on estates, pp. 29, 32, 35, 167-8, 197, 324
    • S 524. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, the 14th-century cartularies note that Eadric gave the land to Dunstan, pp. 30, 34, 39, 47-9
    • S 530. Comments, on MS sources, on estate, pp. 10, 30, 34, 39, 143-5
    • S 541. Comments, on MS sources, on estate, pp. 10, 30, 34, 39, 143-5
    • S 551. Comments, on MS sources, on estate history, on beneficiary, pp. 29, 34, 115-17, 132 n. 353, 168, 173-4
    • S 553. Comments, on production of MS 1 and its later transmission; on MS sources; on estate, charter not genuine, pp. 12, 36, 211-14
    • S 555. Comments, on MS sources, on estate history, accepts Buckland Denham identification, pp. 29, 34, 39, 63-4, 189, 345
    • S 563. Comments, on MS 1; on endorsement; on details of bounds; on estate, pp. 10, 11, 19 n. 56, 66, 123, 195-8
    • S 564. Comments, on possible links with Gl 77 (S 1735a), pp. 93-4
    • S 568. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 30, 33, 39, 52-3
    • S 570. Comments, discusses relationship with Gl 83 (S 1740a), another Henstridge charter in favour of Brihtric, apparently preserved at Glastonbury, pp. 137-9
    • S 571. Comments, pp. 137-8, 258
    • S 580. Comments, on MS sources, on estate, on missing bounds, pp. 28, 33, 37, 158-60, 320 n. 11
    • S 593. Comments, on estate, p. 254 n. 72
    • S 606. Comments, on boundary mark, on estate, pp. 51, 63 n. 75
    • S 612. Comments, on estate history, pp. 158-60
    • S 625. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, authenticity of charter uncertain, pp. 30, 35, 39, 179-80
    • S 626. Comments, on MS sources; on estate history, charter may represent a grant fo liberty for an estate already in Glastonbury's possession, pp. 28, 33, 35, 38, 130-1, 191-3, 322
    • S 644. Comments, on MS sources; estate probably at Colway in Lyme Regis, Dorset, pp. 29, 36, 29, 155-7
    • S 693. Comments, cited, p. 292
    • S 721. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, possible that bounds of Ottery St Mary were attached to a charter originally covering Othery, Somerset, pp. 29, 35, 38, 189-91
    • S 727. Comments, note on Mideltune bounds, p. 175
    • S 742. Comments, on MS sources, on estate history, pp. 29, 39, 64-5
    • S 743. Comments, on MS sources, on estate history, pp. 29, 33, 38, 174-5
    • S 744. Comments, on estate, p. 199 n. 45
    • S 747. Comments, on MS sources, on estates, pp. 29, 34, 35, 39, 166, 173-4
    • S 764. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 29, 36, 39, 225-8
    • S 766. Comments, on Deverill, p. 108
    • S 775. Comments, on MS sources; on estate, pp. 30, 34, 39, 143-5
    • S 783. Comments, on MS source; on relationship with other Glastonbury grants of privileges; on churches mentioned in charter, pp. 37, 56, 76-7, 128-30, 131, 154, 166, 170, 179, 192, 209, 218 n. 5
    • S 785. Comments, on estate, p. 254 n. 72
    • S 786. Comments, citing Kitson, bounds may be from 990s, p. 213 n. 133
    • S 791. Comments, on MS sources, on Braunton, on Ham, pp. 29, 33, 38, 66-9, 134-5
    • S 793. Comments, on MS sources; Berrow identification may not be secure, pp. 29, 37, 71, 84, 119-20
    • S 804. Comments, note on Bleadon, p. 63 n. 75
    • S 825. Comments, on Crowcombe, pp. 86-7
    • S 862. Comments, note on bounds, p. 50 n. 46
    • S 866. Comments, on textual transmission; on MS sources; on estate history, pp. 15 n. 29, 30, 39, 149-52
    • S 871. Comments, on textual transmission; authenticity uncertain, pp. 15, 247-8
    • S 884. Comments, on Camel, p. 79
    • S 966. Comments, may have authentic basis, post-Conquest in present form, pp. 15 n. 31, 127-30, 348 n. 148
    • S 1033. Comments, note on estate, p. 190
    • S 1038. Comments, on Chelworth and Corston, pp. 85, 254 n. 72
    • S 1042. Comments, on Binegar, Bleadney, Wedmore, Tarnock, pp. 59, 62-3, 92, 229
    • S 1115. Comments, on Wedmore, p. 92
    • S 1179. Comments, on Escesdun, p. 48
    • S 1205. Comments, on Chelworth, p. 85
    • S 1249. Comments, on MS sources; questionable, discusses identification with Leigh; may represent a recast and combined version of two genuine documents, discusses history of Meare; on Street, pp. 28, 31, 35, 38, 153-4, 169-71, 209-10
    • S 1253. Comments, on MS sources, on estate and boundary marks, pp. 28, 31, 35, 38, 62-3, 157-8, 165-6
    • S 1263. Comments, on Mildenhall, p. 176
    • S 1410. Comments, dedication of Glastonbury; MS sources; corrupt but essentially authentic, discusses estate history of Baltonsborough; Lottisham; Lydford and Scobbanwirht, pp. 6 n. 26, 28, 31, 35, 38, 53-4, 110-11, 163-4, 216-17
    • S 1417. Comments, on Chisledon, pp. 52-3
    • S 1424. Comments, on detail of transaction, p. 181 n. 14
    • S 1485. Comments, on Chelworth, p. 85
    • S 1494. Comments, on bequest of Damerham, pp. 104-7
    • S 1504. Comments, on Æscesdune, pp. 48-9
    • S 1507. Comments, on Chisledon, Burnham and Wedmore, pp. 52-3, 71, 92
    • S 1512. Comments, cited, pp. 78, 138, 257-8
    • S 1515. Comments, on Damerham bequest, pp. 105-7
    • S 1538. Comments, on estates, pp. 96 n. 116, 139